WELCOME

THIS BLOG IS INITIALLY CREATED FOR THE RETIRED EMPLOYEES OF THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY. HOWEVER THERE ARE SOME MATTERS LIKE PENSION SCHEME, GRATUITY RULES, CONSUMERS’ PRICE INDEX AND CALCULATION OF D.A. AND D.R. ON SALARY ON PENSION, WHICH IS EQUALLY USEFUL TO IN-SERVICE EMPLOYEES. ANY CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTIONS ARE WELCOME. - PANKAJ VITHLANI, AHMEDABAD(pvvithalani@yahoo.com)

SC Order Dt. 17-10-2012 


ITEM NO.3               COURT NO.4             SECTION XV


            S U P R E M E   C O U R T   O F   I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IA No.3 In Petition(s) for Special  Leave  to  Appeal  (Civil)  No(s).29956-
29957/2011

L.I.C.                                            Petitioner(s)

                 VERSUS

KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. ETC.            Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for clarification and office report)

Date: 17/10/2012  This I.A. was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

For Petitioner(s)       Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Adv.
                        Mr.Parag P.Tripathy, Sr.Adv.
                     Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
                        Mr.Surajit Bhaduri, Adv.

For Respondent(s)/      Mr.Amarendra Sharan, Sr.Adv.
Applicant               Mr.R.K.Singh, Adv.
                        Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Adv.
                     Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv.

                        Mr.Aakash D.Pratap, Adv.
                        Ms.Vimla Sinha, Adv.
                        Ms.Sushma Suri, A.O.R.

           UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R

I.A.No.3 of 2012 In SLP(C)No.29957 of 2011

            This is an application by the respondent  for  clarification  of
order dated 14.11.2011.
            We have heard Shri Amarendra Sharan, learned senior counsel  for
the applicant and  Dr.A.M.Singhvi,  learned  senior  counsel  for  the  SLP-
petitioner and are  satisfied  that  order  dated  14.11.2011  needs  to  be
clarified so that neither party  may  remain  under  a  mistaken  impression
about the purport of this Court's order.
            In view of the above, paragraph 3 of order dated  14.11.2011  is
substituted with the following:
                 "In the meanwhile, the proceedings pending before the High
           Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 shall remain stayed
           subject to the condition that within eight weeks from today, the
           petitioner shall deposit in the Registry of the High  Court  the
           amount due to the pensioners  i.e.  the  writ  petitioners  with
           effect  from  the  date  of  their  eligibiity  to  get  retiral
           benefits."

            I.A. No.3 of 2012 is disposed of in the manner indicated above.
            As a sequel to disposal of I.A.No.3 of 2012,  I.A.No.4  of  2012
in I.A.No.3 of 2012 in SLP(C)No.29957 of 2011 is also disposed of.


    (Satish K.Yadav)                              (Phoolan Wati Arora)
      Court Master                                    Court Master